God's Word means EXACTLY what It says
about the sun going around a non-moving earth (and not the earth going
around the sun)??
Indeed, what has God said on that subject??
Here are some examples:
a) "SUN, stand THOU still.... And
stood still." (Joshua 10:12,13)
b) "The world also is STABLISHED [i.e.,"fixed"
#3529 Strong's Con.] that
IT CANNOT BE MOVED."
c) "The sun AND the moon stood still
habitation." (Habakkuk 3:11)
d) "He appointed the moon for seasons:
the sun knoweth his GOING DOWN." (Psalm 104:19)
e) "...the world also shall be stable [fixed],
that it be NOT moved." (I Chron. 16:30)
f) "He...hangeth the earth upon nothing."
g) "The sun ALSO ariseth, and the sun goeth
down, and hastens to
his place where he arose." (Eccl.1:5)
h) "...so the sun RETURNED ten degrees...."
i) God..."commandeth the sun,
and it riseth
not." (Job 9:7)
j) "...the sun shall be darkened in his going
forth." (Isaiah 13:10)
k) "The heavens declare the glory of God.... In
them hath He set a tabernacle for the sun, which is as a bridegroom coming out
of his chamber, and rejoiceth as a strong man to run a race.
His going forth is
from the end of the heaven, and his CIRCUIT [orbit] unto the ends of it: and there is nothing hid from
the heat thereof." (Psalm 19:1,4-6)
Add to these,
Dozens of Sun Risings and
Settings, etc...! (HERE)
Truly, as one scholar, a Creationist and a
"...it is evident that geocentricity [a
non-moving earth...] and the inerrant preservation of the Scriptures are
intertwined." (Prof. Hanson, Tychonian Bulletin, S.89,p.21)
By way of contrast, another scholar, a Creationist
and a Heliocentrist, says that he:
"...supports inerrancy and the verbal inspiration of
the Bible", but nevertheless declares that in all the Scriptures above
the Holy Spirit employed a "language of appearance" which gives the
reader license to change the meaning to
fit the heliocentric teaching. (Dr. DeYoung, Audio tape debate with M.
(Bible believing Christians are urged to try applying
DeYoung's "language of appearance" technique to "the
evening and the morning were the first [thru sixth] day"...or to
the virgin birth...or the resurrection, etc., and see where you come
SOME FURTHER "WHAT IFS" FOR CREATIONISTS
ARE QUITE REVEALING:
WHAT IF - Kepler's mother was a witch and he was
raised a warlock assigned to bump Brahe off (HERE),
wreck his work, steal his records,
and twist them to promote Copernicanism and help pave the way for
evolutionism (which he wrote about 250 years before Darwin)?
WHAT IF - Galileo offered no proof whatsoever for heliocentricity but did all he could to elevate secular science over
Bible science, thereby contributing greatly to the establishment of
the mindset that later served evolutionism so well? (HERE)
WHAT IF - Creationists can know that Copernicanism
is the demonstrable precursor of evolutionism both as Bible
destroyer and as the guarantor that the anti-Bible false science
establishment would become modern man's criterion of Truth Itself?
WHAT IF - the
Bible teaches a stationary earth (just like everyone agreed it did
until Copernican and finally Newton's Kabbalist "mathematics" scared the churches into thinking
that "science" had proof of heliocentricity)?
WHAT IF - Einstein's admission that
"fantasy" meant more to him than "positive
knowledge" is demonstrated most powerfully in his Relativity
hypothesis, (that pseudo-mathematical "great work of art"
that rescued a moribund Copernicanism and fostered and vivified
evolution-based Marxism, Freudianism and Humanism)? (HERE)
WHAT IF - mathematics has long since been an art
form capable of depicting anything the "artist" wants?
(And what if the ultimate "artist" behind heliocentric
(moving earth) mathematics is not men but You-Know-Who?!)
WHAT IF - the Michelson-Morley experiments and
scores of other affirmations--particularly regarding the light
fringe results--essentially prove no earth orbit around the sun?
WHAT IF - Relativism--the savior of Copernicanism
almost a century ago and the temporary victor over God's Absolutism
since then--is merely a thick slice of pseudo-scientific baloney and
can be shown to be so? (HERE
WHAT IF - God has allowed the deceptive power of
Satan to be great enough thus far to prevent Creationists (and other
believers in Bible inerrancy) from seeing that Copernicanism--just
like evolutionism--has NO scientific proof whatever to support its
"science-fiction" claims? (HERE)
WHAT IF - "Ah LORD God!...There is nothing too
hard for thee" (Jer.32:17; et al!) is applied to the
orbital speeds required for stars in the "small" geocentric universe?
WHAT IF - The
alleged discoveries of "Dark
Matter" and the anomalies associated with it regarding speed
portend a radical revision in the speed-of-light dogma?
WHAT IF - The universe--because of complex matters
involving parallax and "non-Euclidian geometry", the
vagaries of reflections, etc.--is much, much, smaller than we are
WHAT IF - It is God's Plan to first expose Copernicanism as a scientific fraud (as a certain means to bringing
down not only evolutionism but the whole secular scientific
establishment idol)? (HERE)
WHAT IF - The
Copernican Model is essential to the
"extra-terrestrial" hype which is nothing more nor less
than a highly effective propaganda campaign for evolutionism (...we
"evolved" here and "they...evolved out there")?
WHAT IF - Darwin's
German Bulldog and Marx's Right Hand Man Recognized the Unbreakable
Link Between Darwinism and Copernicanism? (HERE)
WHAT IF - Hitler,
Lenin, Stalin, Mao, et al were all fervent believers in and zealous
promoters of Darwinian Evolutionism and the Copernican
Heliocentricity that preceded it? (HERE)
- Today's Copernican-dependent, evolution-based "creation scenario"
for the Universe, the Earth and all life forms including mankind is
directly derived from ancient and current writings of Bible-bashing,
Christ-hating Rabbinical Kabbalists?? (HERE
WHAT IF, WHAT IF, WHAT IF....?
honestly from all known evidence, we know that these "What If's" add
up to one inescapable Truth. That Truth is that the Bible is
just what it claims to be, namely, the inerrant, sufficient,
infallible Word of the living God who cannot lie.
So, as a
Creationist, what if you have to stand up for the plain Biblical
non-moving Earth because: a) It is a pivotal feature of the
Genesis Creation Account wherein
(in addition to the hard evidence at this site)
there was no sun to go around until
the 4th day; b) The alleged size and age of the universe which
provide the billions of years for the evolution hypothesis
self-destructs without heliocentricity, and continued support of
heliocentricity while claiming to be a literal six-day Creationist
is hypocrisy; c) The now available facts demonstrating that all the
concepts upholding the heliocentricity-dependent Big Bang Paradigm
of 15 billion years of evolutionism comprise an alternate "creation
scenario" from a Christ-hating "holy book" of the Pharisee Religion.
the only choice for Creationists now taking shape is this: Are you
going to be a Zohar/ Kabbala/ Pharisee Big Bang Evolutionary
"creationist" or the Bible/Christian Anti-Evolution Creationist the
world believes you to be?